New Stonehenge theory

General discussions of issues of the paranormal affecting our community. A place where you can ask questions, and others will offer answers.
Post Reply
Hannah
Posts: 1766
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:25 am
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?

New Stonehenge theory

Post by Hannah »

CBC News wrote:Stonehenge started as giant graveyard, study suggests
Human remains excavated from the site may belong to elite families
The Associated Press Posted: Mar 11, 2013 4:30 PM ET Last Updated: Mar 11, 2013 4:07 PM ET

British researchers have proposed a new theory for the origins of Stonehenge: It may have started as a giant burial ground for elite families around 3,000 B.C.

New studies of cremated human remains excavated from the site suggest that about 500 years before the Stonehenge we know today was built, a larger stone circle was erected at the same site as a community graveyard, researchers said Saturday.

"These were men, women, children, so presumably family groups," University College London professor Mike Parker Pearson, who led the team, said. "We'd thought that maybe it was a place where a dynasty of kings was buried, but this seemed to be much more of a community, a different kind of power structure."

Parker Pearson said archeologists studied the cremated bones of 63 individuals, and believed that they were buried around 3,000 B.C. The location of many of the cremated bodies was originally marked by bluestones, he said. That earlier circular enclosure, which measured around 91 metres across, could have been the burial ground for about 200 more people, Parker Pearson said.

The team, which included academics from more than a dozen British universities, also put forth some theories about the purpose of the second Stonehenge — the monument still standing in the countryside in southern England today.

Multiple theories

Various theories have been proposed about Stonehenge, including that it was a place for Druid worship, an observatory for astronomical studies, or a place of healing, built by early inhabitants of Britain who roamed around with their herds.

Parker Pearson said the latest study suggested that Stonehenge should be seen less a temple of worship than a kind of building project that served to unite people from across Britain.

Analysis of the remains of a Neolithic settlement near the monument indicated that thousands of people travelled from as far as Scotland to the site, bringing their livestock and families for huge feasts and celebrations during the winter and summer solstices.

The team studied the teeth of pigs and cattle found at the "builders' camp," and deduced that the animals were mostly slaughtered around nine months or 15 months after their spring births. That meant they were likely eaten in feasts during the midwinter and midsummer, Parker Pearson said.

"We don't think (the builders) were living there all the time. We could tell that by when they were killing the pigs — they were there for the solstices," he said.

The researchers believe that the builders converged seasonally to build Stonehenge, but not for very long — likely over a period of a decade or so.

The mass monument building is thought to end around the time when the "Beaker people," so called because of their distinctive pottery, arrived from continental Europe, Parker Pearson said.


I will be who I chose to be.
Cybermancer
Posts: 1071
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:41 am
Contact:

Re: New Stonehenge theory

Post by Cybermancer »

Stonehenge has always intrigued me. Even as we learn more about it's origins, more questions are raised. For example, who were these people who felt it necessary to build monuments out of stone?

And of course there is the question of who designed it, with such precision?

We may never know.
This account used to belong to someone else. Now it's mine. My first post on this board begins here.
"The strong polish their fangs,
While the weak polish their wisdom."
Post Reply

Return to “Community Outreach”