Page 1 of 1

The Scientific American's Take on Cryptozoology

Posted: Mon Aug 04, 2008 12:57 pm
by Ron Caliburn

Re: The Scientific American's Take on Cryptozoology

Posted: Tue Aug 05, 2008 3:52 pm
by Debunker
I employ Sulloway’s maxim every time I encounter Bigfoot hunters and Nessie seekers. Their tales make for gripping narratives, but they do not make sound science. A century has been spent searching for these chimerical creatures. Until a body is produced, skepticism is the appropriate response.


I couldnt have said it better myself.


Re: The Scientific American's Take on Cryptozoology

Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:45 am
by Last Moon
This is a great problem in my research as well. Very few documented bodies have been recovered and they almost all have turned out to be indistinguishable from animals or to be men dressed in animal pelts or with unusual quantities of body hair. As of yet there has been no confirmed recovery of a fully hybrid form Therian.