Montauk Cryptid
-
- Posts: 6915
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:09 pm
- Location: Best if you don't know.
Montauk Cryptid
Apparently some sort of creature has washed ashore near Montauk, a site long associated with theories about the government and aliens and crossplanar phenomena.
Already the "experts" are trying to discredit the image as a fake.
Already the "experts" are trying to discredit the image as a fake.
Re: Montauk Cryptid
That is one ugly looking thing. Looks like a mutated Mexican hairless rat.
The only thing strange in the photo I noticed was that it seemed to be flipping off the camera.
The only thing strange in the photo I noticed was that it seemed to be flipping off the camera.
“Whoever starts out toward the unknown must consent to venture alone.” - Andre Gide
-
- Posts: 6915
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:09 pm
- Location: Best if you don't know.
Re: Montauk Cryptid
One of the reasons it's beeing labeleld a photoshop job.
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 9:20 am
- Location: Withheld for my protection
Re: Montauk Cryptid
Its interesting that the Plum Island Animal Disease Center is located nearby. makes one wonder what they are really doing there.
"Truth is stranger than fiction, and much more terrifying."
Re: Montauk Cryptid
Yeah, after reading about that area it all sounds odd.
Is anyone going to independently test the creature?
Is anyone going to independently test the creature?
“Whoever starts out toward the unknown must consent to venture alone.” - Andre Gide
Re: Montauk Cryptid
Here are some news stories The East Hampton Star and Newsday that cover the story.
Some of my favorite quote from the first story
The best part of the second one.
Some of my favorite quote from the first story
“. . . but unless the government is trying to design horrible Montauk Monsters that will eat I.E.D.s and fart fire at bad Iraqis, we’re not sure why they would create such an unthinkable beast,” a blogger for the Web site wrote. “Our guess is it’s viral marketing for something.”
The best part of the second one.
He knows what it isn't.
A raccoon. ("The legs appear to be too long in proportion to the body.")
A sea turtle. ("Sea turtles do not have teeth.")
A rodent. ("Rodents have two huge, curved incisor teeth in front of their mouths.")
He said the general body shape looks like a dog or other canine ("Coyote?"). But that the "prominent eye ridge and the feet" don't match.
He said the feet and face look "somewhat ovine" -- that would be like a sheep -- but sheep don't have sharp teeth.
Wise's best, educated guess: "A talented someone who got very creative with latex."
“Whoever starts out toward the unknown must consent to venture alone.” - Andre Gide
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:56 am
- Location: My Paranromal team is based in the U.K., but we travel world wide
Re: Montauk Cryptid
Looks my my return from Tibet was just in time.
Of course its a latex model... would else would it be? I see that a few years experience for you all has left you none the wiser.
Nothing's changed here while I was away it seems.
Of course its a latex model... would else would it be? I see that a few years experience for you all has left you none the wiser.
Nothing's changed here while I was away it seems.
Elliott James Tobias III
AKA: Debunker
"The truth is indeed out there...science has been pointing it out for centuries."
AKA: Debunker
"The truth is indeed out there...science has been pointing it out for centuries."
-
- Posts: 6915
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:09 pm
- Location: Best if you don't know.
Re: Montauk Cryptid
Have you examined the remains personally to make that conclusion?
Welcome back Debunker, a lot more than you expect has changed.
How was the visit with the monks?
Welcome back Debunker, a lot more than you expect has changed.
How was the visit with the monks?
Re: Montauk Cryptid
I cannot believe my eyes. Debunker has returned.
Man have I missed your willingness to take up the other side of the debate.
I just hope they will publish the evidence that back up whatever official view they pick. Personally, I am still holding out a little bit of hope that they are government designed I.E.D. eating and fire farting monsters just for my own amusement.
If it is latex, that should have been fairly easy to identify by any skilled professional. However, some idiot supposedly ran off with the thing so we may never really know.
Man have I missed your willingness to take up the other side of the debate.
I just hope they will publish the evidence that back up whatever official view they pick. Personally, I am still holding out a little bit of hope that they are government designed I.E.D. eating and fire farting monsters just for my own amusement.
If it is latex, that should have been fairly easy to identify by any skilled professional. However, some idiot supposedly ran off with the thing so we may never really know.
“Whoever starts out toward the unknown must consent to venture alone.” - Andre Gide
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:56 am
- Location: My Paranromal team is based in the U.K., but we travel world wide
Re: Montauk Cryptid
There is always a convenient excuse for a lack of evidence... ALWAYS.
Elliott James Tobias III
AKA: Debunker
"The truth is indeed out there...science has been pointing it out for centuries."
AKA: Debunker
"The truth is indeed out there...science has been pointing it out for centuries."
-
- Posts: 2793
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:46 pm
- Location: Where needed
Re: Montauk Cryptid
Welcome back Debunker.
Actually until either I see the remains, or someone I trust examines the remains I will take this story with a very large grain of salt.
Actually until either I see the remains, or someone I trust examines the remains I will take this story with a very large grain of salt.
To find the darkness you have walk in the shadows.
-
- Posts: 6915
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:09 pm
- Location: Best if you don't know.
Re: Montauk Cryptid
According to this article, there are one or more witnessess to the Montauk Cryptid washing up on that beach.