Page 1 of 3
Ghost? Vampire? Or just another nutjob?
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:04 am
by Fioravanti
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:10 pm
by mrloucifer
I would say a ghost is the most likely suspect, but I'd like not to think so. The "Poe Toaster" has been around for like 60+ years now. Before my sudden "awakening" to the supernatural 15 years ago, I had a lot of respect and admiration to the mysteriousness of the Poe toaster. Life was so mundane, and there seemed to be no mysteries in life anymore (before that fateful night) and I admired that this small token of appreciation to E. Poe every birthday as an annonymous party (just 1 day after mine btw) still happens to this day, and so far people have respected his wish to remain anonymous, and have left this paticular mystery alone. It gives me hope that people may one day accept and even welcome the mysteries that is the supernatural, and the few of us who already have accepted this mysterious force of nature will be part of the general populace instead of hidden keepers of a secret truth nobody wants to know. It’s a small hope, but its hope none the less.
Sorry, I’m over killing my statement (I get that way when impassioned about the subject). In the short version, he could be a ghost, could be a vampire, could be a nutjob; or he could be just an average job with an admiration of Poe’s works, who knows. But these days its a welcome change to have a mystery without the danger of being eaten / beaten / killed / terrorized or worse by it.
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2005 12:31 pm
by Geronimus
leave him alone, he ain't hurtin anybody.
Posted: Wed Jan 26, 2005 6:44 pm
by Ron Caliburn
If it's dangerous, kill it. If it's weird, watch to see if it will become dangerous.
Posted: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:33 am
by Silhouette
Geronimus wrote:leave him alone, he ain't hurtin anybody.
I tend to be wary of that level of committment and secrecy without any explanation.
If I was there I'd probably just walk up and simply ask him. But then again I don't much care, as I've never had much time for poetry. In general everything except for Kipling drives me nuts.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 1:00 pm
by Ron Caliburn
Who or whatever it is, he is still at it.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 5:45 pm
by concrete_Angel
You men! You have no romance in your souls. You think if you can't just outright kill it, it's something even more dangerous. And although I admit that sometimes itIS true, there's still room for a mystery that DOESN'T end up chomping on people.
Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2008 7:08 pm
by Ron Caliburn
Look, I'm just concerned about someone who performs a yearly ritual at the grave of one of a man whose mastery of the macabre and occult is world famous - and more interestingly, his "sons" now carry out this same ritual.
WHat is the signifigance of this ritual? What do they hope to accomplish?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 9:01 am
by KonThaak
To honor and respect the dead? To bring his existence to the attention of a world that seems to care less and less? For random shits and giggles?
Maybe the person is Japanese... Sounds very similar to a tradition they perform over there.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 3:45 pm
by GhostSpider
Have to agree with Angel and KT on this one. I just don't see anything "wrong" with this one.
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 5:24 pm
by concrete_Angel
Besides, if there was some evil ritual involved, why the hell would it take this many years with no effect?
Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 6:58 pm
by Ron Caliburn
How do we know that it isn't actually already in effect and the effects will continue until we put an end to the ritual? This ritual started several years before the majority of us were born remember.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 11:32 am
by Ethan Skinner
I'm not liking this... when I showed Clarity the article, her words were literally: "What a nice thing to do. It's a lovely diversion for all involved."
Guys, I don't think this is the crux of the problem.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:58 pm
by GhostSpider
Why do we need to put an end to the ritual?
This is a sign of over paranoia. Let it go Ron, its harmless.
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:19 pm
by Ron Caliburn
I'm not saying put an end to it, I'm saying we need to find out the whos and the whys.
It’s probably just an admirer . . .
Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2008 7:39 pm
by Eilonwy Solstice
I think an admirer expressing their respect in a romanticized manner is a good thing. It’s wonderful that children are potentially being taught the merits of being well read on classic literature.
And the roses are a lovely expression, too.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:28 pm
by Kolya
Ethan Skinner wrote:I'm not liking this... when I showed Clarity the article, her words were literally: "What a nice thing to do. It's a lovely diversion for all involved."
Guys, I don't think this is the crux of the problem.
What is the crux of the problem?
Rituals involving dead people bother me.
Re: It’s probably just an admirer . . .
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:30 pm
by Kolya
Eilonwy Solstice wrote:I think an admirer expressing their respect in a romanticized manner is a good thing. It’s wonderful that children are potentially being taught the merits of being well read on classic literature.
And the roses are a lovely expression, too.
Poe wrote odes.
Maybe this admirer should, too.
Roses are red.
Violets are blue.
I know you're dead.
But I still love you.
Roses
and romance...
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:48 pm
by Ron Caliburn
If it were someone who wasn't famous for his macabre talents, I wouldn't be nearly so concerned.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:50 pm
by concrete_Angel
OK, so by your reasoning, anyone who stalks Stephen King is trying to use him in a demonic ritual?
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:53 pm
by Kolya
concrete_Angel wrote:OK, so by your reasoning, anyone who stalks Stephen King might be trying to use him in a demonic ritual?
Fixed that for you, angel.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:59 pm
by concrete_Angel
No, that was intentional, since Ron believes that because of the macabre nature of Poe's works, he's being used for something sinister. Which means that EVERY stalker of horror writers is obviously doing something evil, and must be stopped. No MIGHT BE about it.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:00 pm
by Kolya
Ron Caliburn wrote:I'm not saying put an end to it, I'm saying we need to find out the whos and the whys.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:01 pm
by Ron Caliburn
Have I said we need to stop this guy? No, I've said we need to find out what's really going on.
Then stop him if we need to.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:01 pm
by concrete_Angel
Ron Caliburn wrote:If it's dangerous, kill it. If it's weird, watch to see if it will become dangerous.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:04 pm
by Ron Caliburn
See, Sue you just proved my point. We only need to kill it if it's dangerous.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:06 pm
by Kolya
Agreed.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:14 pm
by concrete_Angel
OK, I never said KILLED, I said STOPPED. YOU"RE the one who said KILL, Ron! And I'm getting tired of people not trying to actually understand what I'm saying, by the way.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:19 pm
by Kolya
Which means that EVERY stalker of horror writers is obviously doing something evil, and must be stopped.
I understand what you're saying.
I understand that this is not Ron's stance, too.
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:28 pm
by Ron Caliburn
What misunderstanding Sue? You're trying to say that we're reading too much into this.
We're trying to say that we need to be sure these events aren't more signifigant than we know.