• NASA Coverup Exposed!

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 7:20 pm**

NASA has either solved the bigfoot mystery, discovered life on Mars or both in one fell swoop - but they've kept quiet about it for almost 4 years now!

Bigfoot on Mars? NASA captures alien figure

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:41 pm**

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:47 pm**

The Face . . . the Pyramids . . . the Sasquatch

Doesn't it all make sense now?

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:52 pm**

To some, it's always made sense.

What interests me most about this story is how a primate survives in the practically non-existing Martian atmosphere which is something like 95% carbon dioxide, not to mention the utter lack of water or other source of food.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 8:54 pm**

Because, Mars is easily capable of supporting life and has for thousands of years - NASA just is a part of the disinformation campaign to make us think otherwise.

But they let this get out through the cracks.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:04 pm**

It may be able to support life but not 2 meters tall primates. The cover up must have began more than 40 years ago, which is possible, but not one I buy into.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:11 pm**

What about the Canals?

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:27 pm**

The atmosphere is thin and only getting thinner as the solar wind blows it away. I think Mars already cannot sustain liquid water because of the thin atmosphere. A long time ago, perhaps, it was enough. But this thinning atmosphere has too much carbon dioxide for primates anyway.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:29 pm**

And that information comes to us from the official government agencies who desperately want to hide the fact that their Martian masters are preparing to invade.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:40 pm**

Well it's been 40 years (at least) in the making then.

Posted: **Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:42 pm**

It's not like Interplanetary invasions are a spurr of the momment thing.

Besides, it's been at least 61, probably longer.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:11 am**

Fifty bucks says it's a chunk of rock... Even if the atmosphere isn't thinning, all the photos of Mars show a white sky, not a blue one. There isn't enough atmosphere to support carbon-based life-forms. Note that I'm not saying there is no life on Mars; I'm just saying it isn't carbon-based, and it doesn't breathe oxygen. Chances are, it would be single-celled, or, at most, microscopic multicellular organisms.

If we get invaded by germs that will choke and die on our oxygenated atmosphere, I will laugh my ass off.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 12:49 pm**

There isn't enough of anything to support bigfoot, or even littlefoot.

Microorganisms, maybe. After all, some scientists fantasised about Floaters in Jupiter's atmosphere. They weren't found, but I guess they could still be there.

Zoologists finding new species regularly just on Earth...

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:36 pm**

I'll agree with those who say it isn't alive, but it does look like a statue of some sort.

Maybe a golem?

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 3:43 pm**

Hypnotic suggestion.
Hoax.
Photoshop.
A little from each.

Either road, not a primate whatsoever.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:44 pm**

You're limiting yourself by assuming it's a carbon based lifeform requring an oxygen-rich atmosphere.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 6:59 pm**

The article made the claim about bigfoot.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:06 pm**

Again, you're assuming the described lifeform is cabon based and requires an oxygen rich atmosphere - that's been yet to be prooven of the Sasquatch.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:12 pm**

Yea that's true. Then again, I can't prove anything...

I don't know a cryptozoologist who suggests bigfoot isn't an O2 breathing primate.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:19 pm**

I don't know one who can proove it is.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:44 pm**

Like I said.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:54 pm**

As soon as a cryptozoologist can proove if the sasquatch is or isn't a carbon based oxygen breathing lifeform . . .well we won't have cryptozoologists studying the sasquatch any more.

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 7:56 pm**

Then it'll just be the zoologists.

Which is the point of crytozoology, isn't it?

Posted: **Thu Jan 24, 2008 11:40 pm**

Guys, I hate to burst your bubbles here, but a few things occur to me as I look at these pictures...

1: If you look at the lower half of the figure, it looks like one solid mass, not like a pair of legs in motion. The upper half does indeed look like the blurry photos of Bigfoot...but at that resolution, so does Mitch on a bad day.

2: I have yet to see footage of Bigfoot that I can accept as proof of its existence, but assuming it does, indeed, exist, I can say that I've never heard of it attacking anyone. Therefore, whether it's on Earth or Mars, I don't think it poses much of a threat.

3: If it doesn't require Oxygen to survive, then most likely, the gas would be toxic to it. Our planet used to have a Carbon Dioxide-based atmosphere, and the single-celled organisms living under it were some of the most stable ones this world has ever seen. According to microbiologists, the single-celled organisms from that day and age reproduced asexually, just like most similar organisms do, and they hardly ever mutated. Evolution was pretty much a moot point.

One strain then started to produce oxygen instead of carbon dioxide, and all the other organisms--which had required carbon dioxide to survive--were poisoned by the oxygen, in much the same way we suffer from carbon monoxide poisoning.

So--if that isn't just a rock outcrop--that's either not Bigfoot, or Bigfoot has one HELL of an evolutionary history behind it.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:58 am**

When I said primate, I implied pretty much everything you just said.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:24 pm**

Primate is at best an an proximation until it can be proven.

Posted: **Fri Jan 25, 2008 7:30 pm**

I understand. I'm just going off the claims of the article that it is Bigfoot.

Posted: **Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:11 pm**

What is life and how do you know you've found it?

Posted: **Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:06 pm**

Usually when it tries to kill you.

Posted: **Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:31 pm**

True. Unfortunately, doesn't have to be alive for that.