Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 10:16 am
So, what's up duamerthrax?
Page 4 of 7
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:37 pm
why would you be insulted about mr. rogers? i watched him growing up, the guy was nice. he was just always giving out advice like "you are an important person" and "you can't go down the drain", just lessons for little kids. what's so insulting?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:42 pm
I don't know what is insulting about it. I'm not American and not wholly familiar with the cultural connotations that calling someone Mr Rogers might carry. That's why I asked for a yes or a no, not an evasion.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:44 pm
the guy was a kids show host. he was nice, and taught kids important lessons. if you're REALLY insulted by a reference to a nice guy that kids liked, that's up to you. but i'm not evading, and i wasn't using it as an insult. happy?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:48 pm
A yes or no would have been sufficient from the get go.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:41 pm
I would swear he was gay.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:56 pm
In Britian he might be haha.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:08 pm
All I know is he looked like his mom dressed him and she had bad taste in sweaters.Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:41 pm
Mr. Rogers was always very dapper looking!
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:48 pm
Bert_the_Turtle wrote:Mr. Rogers was always very dapper looking!
So you like wearing pastel sweaters Mr. Turtle?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:52 pm
Not personally but he always looked very refined and gentlemanly.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 3:53 pm
I don’t know if I would describe him that way. It just sounds . . . wrong.Bert_the_Turtle wrote:Mr. Rogers was always very dapper looking!
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:17 pm
No wonder you're all insane.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:21 pm
Kolya wrote:No wonder you're all insane.
I thought that was already established, Kolya?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:25 pm
Never much cared for Mr. Rogers when I was a kid.
Ah by the way Kolya isn't that a bit of Pot and Kettle there?
Ah by the way Kolya isn't that a bit of Pot and Kettle there?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:29 pm
That you are all insane? Yes.Eilonwy Solstice wrote:Kolya wrote:No wonder you're all insane.
I thought that was already established, Kolya?
Why you are all insane? Not previously (I think).
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:30 pm
No.Shadowstalker wrote:Never much cared for Mr. Rogers when I was a kid.
Ah by the way Kolya isn't that a bit of Pot and Kettle there?
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:33 pm
Yeah right sure.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:33 pm
I didn't like hime either watch about ten minutes and told my mom he scared me, so she put in The Muppet Show for me to watch.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:34 pm
Glad we cleared that upShadowstalker wrote:Yeah right sure.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:34 pm
You brought the up Muppets on purpose didn't you?!Sophoroto wrote:I didn't like hime either watch about ten minutes and told my mom he scared me, so she put in The Muppet Show for me to watch.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:41 pm
Hey they were one of my favorite shows when I was little.
And yes I did.
And yes I did.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:50 pm
You make an old man proud.
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:54 pm
Thank you. Oops goto go Mr. Phillips is calling.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 2:52 am
Hope you did not get into trouble.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:12 am
Muppets . . . Mr. Rogers . . . bah.
Hannah and I grew up watching Army Training films . . didn't hurt us none.
Hannah and I grew up watching Army Training films . . didn't hurt us none.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:27 am
I don't think I watched TV recreationally until about 1992. Didn't really like it so I haven't really done it since.
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2007 9:53 am
Kolya wrote:Hope you did not get into trouble.
Nope, it was time for my lessons. That and he said I had been on the computer to long.
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 2:34 am
Sophoroto, do you mind looking at some files for me? I know I am missing something, and it should make sense, but I just cant see it. possibly the suspicion and waryness that has built up over the years blinding me to the obvious.
I have all of these accounts clustered together in a single file, from back when I was first putting my archives together but I can't seem to place why they are filed together in a single numbered file rather than properly broken down, cross referenced, and filed catagoricly.
I have all of these accounts clustered together in a single file, from back when I was first putting my archives together but I can't seem to place why they are filed together in a single numbered file rather than properly broken down, cross referenced, and filed catagoricly.
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:46 pm
Kei Nakamura wrote:Sophoroto, do you mind looking at some files for me? I know I am missing something, and it should make sense, but I just cant see it. possibly the suspicion and waryness that has built up over the years blinding me to the obvious.
I have all of these accounts clustered together in a single file, from back when I was first putting my archives together but I can't seem to place why they are filed together in a single numbered file rather than properly broken down, cross referenced, and filed catagoricly.
Um, sure, you do realize I am not a trained researcher though don't you?
Don't get me wrong I love to read and study. It's just that you guys are trained and have alot more um, working knowledge than I do.