Page 3 of 4

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:59 pm
by Kolya
Share the love :lol:

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:09 pm
by Koralth
I'm sorry, Kolya, but you had been somewhat less than agreeable with Angel, though it seems to have worked itself out, now...

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:46 pm
by Sasha
:D

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:35 am
by Kolya
An innocent person is willing to subject themselves to effective lie detectors in order to affirm innocence. I was merely offering an effective lie detector test so that Angel could affirm her innocence. I don't think that's being disagreeable.

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:45 pm
by concrete_Angel
Sorry, but I'm not really sure if I trust some guy that eats people and sounds like an extra from "Deliverance". I don't mean that in a bad way, but...

Hell, at this point, I'll try anything. Just keep him from basting me.

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:51 pm
by Kolya
He did not know he was eating humans. It was Skeeter that cooked them up. Scotty and company thought they were eating those feral hogs Scotty killed on a hunting trip.

You underestimate Scotty's intelligence and intentions. Just so you know.

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:53 pm
by concrete_Angel
All right, all right.

SCOTTY: I would formally like to apologize for any undue comments I may have made about you. I was wrong, and should have gotten to know you better. That being said- go easy on me?

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 3:54 pm
by Kolya
I have PM'd Scotty (again).

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:28 am
by KonThaak
Problem: Most lie detectors can be fooled. In my experience, this includes the intelligent ones.

Potential Solution: Find a way around it. According to my runes, she wasn't responsible, doesn't know who is responsible, and wasn't anywhere remotely near her father the night it happened... I'm getting some odd responses for the question, "Who killed Susan's father?" I'll get back to y'all once I figure out what they're trying to tell me...

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:17 am
by Kolya
I was only half serious at the start about Scotty. But having him grinning in a dark corner might get the result we're looking for. Furthermore, it takes a lot of training an dpractice to defeat a polygraph.

Any leads on who might have murdered her father?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:19 pm
by Thomas Sheldon
All current technological lie detection can be fooled with proper training, do magical methods have the same drawbacks of relying on nervous response?

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 12:06 am
by Kolya
Not in my experience, although wearing down the pysche expedites the process.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 7:27 am
by concrete_Angel
Wow. I certainly feel safer now.

Posted: Sat Jul 21, 2007 6:32 pm
by Kolya
Only those that resist, Angel.
The ones that have something to hide.

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:07 am
by concrete_Angel
Yeah, I know I'm not exactly Marilyn VosSavant, but whatever mind I have, I'd prefer to keep. If it's safe for the truthful, I'll do it. Otherwise, I'd better hear more info from good ol' CSI:Chicago after they're done investigating.

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 1:49 am
by Kolya
If it will help somehow, we can talk the specifics.
However, it would not have any legal weight whatsoever.

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 2:40 am
by Shadowstalker
I think I will try something.

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:03 pm
by Kolya
Decided to have something different for breakfast? ;)

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:44 pm
by Shadowstalker
:roll: Kolya Sometimes your attempts at humor, fall very short, and flat.
No I am going to be trying a deep scan of Angels memories. I already know that she has not lied to me, but maybe I can help her get a better idea of where she was when her Father was killed.

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 7:56 pm
by Ron Caliburn
Last check I had, polygraphs are not admissible as evidence in a court of law - too foolable.

In the meantime she's placed herself in a police interrogation room. . .

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 10:12 pm
by Kolya
Shadowstalker wrote:I think I will try something.

Very vague.
Sorry :)

Posted: Sun Jul 22, 2007 11:14 pm
by concrete_Angel
Let me guess, Ron, you want some excuse to pistol-whip me?

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 12:14 am
by Kolya
There's PM for that kind of talk :P

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:43 am
by concrete_Angel
Hey, he's not Sasha, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't think that was kinky.

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 9:34 am
by Kolya
Ron is one surprise after another :D

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 1:14 pm
by Sasha
concrete_Angel wrote:Hey, he's not Sasha, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't think that was kinky.
Do I need to bring a pistol, too? :o

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:43 pm
by concrete_Angel
Your choice, hot stuff. :wink:

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:57 pm
by Ron Caliburn
No I didn't think it was kinky - I think it's also a good way to misalign your sights or have your weapon taken from you.

Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2007 8:00 pm
by Natasha
Guns are for shooting holes into things.

Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:12 am
by concrete_Angel
I could say something, but I'll just stay out of it.