Page 2 of 3

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:42 am
by GhostSpider
Unmake? No, more like unravel.

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:33 am
by Kolya
Destroy.

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:57 pm
by Ron Caliburn
My signature covers it.

Posted: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:03 pm
by concrete_Angel
CAn't, possibly, but try won't.

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:23 pm
by Kolya
Is that actual English?

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 2:59 pm
by concrete_Angel
If you are aware of the context, then yes.

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:01 pm
by Kolya
The context is English language?

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:07 pm
by concrete_Angel
Well, I'm not speaking Chinese, here!

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:09 pm
by Kolya
I recognise they are words of the ENglish language.

But you may as well said "I friend dogs can".

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:02 pm
by KonThaak
[qutoe="Ron Caliburn"]Ain't nuthin' that can't die.[/quote]

concrete_Angel wrote:CAn't, possibly, but try won't.


She's suggesting an alternate wording for Ron's catch phrase and life philosophy.

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 6:46 pm
by Kolya
Things try not to die?

Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 11:27 pm
by concrete_Angel
Kolya wrote:Things try not to die?


Yes, every day.

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:18 am
by Kolya
Ok just trying to understand this strange English you speak.

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:56 am
by concrete_Angel
Maybe if I just include the comment right before mine in my answer, you won't get so confused. You'd be able to understand a little better.

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:37 am
by Sasha
I understand, of course.

Posted: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:45 am
by Natasha
Liar :P

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:13 pm
by Kolya
I'm not following, but I don't really care anymore.

Re:

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 2:08 pm
by Bearshaman
DarKnyht wrote:I think magic can be evil in two ways. The first is simply using magic to further your own evil intentions (the dark side if you will). I.E. Using it in greed, anger, hatred.

The second is the magic that goes against what nature intended. Some things are not meant to be changed, and I believe a druid would understand this point. For example, no one knows what lies beyond the veil of death. We do not know what we are bringing back from it or what consequences we are unleashing in the process.

Trying to get us back on subject here, not trying to start a arguement here DarKnyht, but to say that any magic that goes against what nature intended is evil, is to say that most magic is evil, but then again, so is most technology. Most of your magic bends the rules of nature, to heal, we are accellerating the "natural" process to mend. Changing sticks into snakes, is against natures rules as well.

The thing with Necromancy that most people forget, is that the magic works with the dead, this means you can commune with the dead, IE Ghosts, and possibly lay them to rest. Not just zombies and skeletons to run around doing the Can Can.

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Thu May 29, 2008 5:35 pm
by arkaine
Michael T wrote:There has been alot of people telling our resident druid necromancy is evil. I would like to get a debate started on why each of you belives this. I am not saying that there is not evil usage of necromancy, I am curious as to what makes it evil in it's self.

Debate away please.


Michael T.


Michael let me address your question in my opinions.

Magic is what you make it. Yes your druid friend has been told correctly. Necromancy is inherently a dark art followed by evil men. Were a species devoted to life and very ceremonial to our loved ones who passed before us. Necromancy intercedes into our daily views of normalcy.

There is a natural law of order when it comes to life and death. Necromancy interrupts that law by harnessing the energy of the dead and manipulating it to there will.

There are certain aspects of Necromancy that many do practice however. Divination. The ability to commune with the dead is a form of necromantic practices that many men of magic and psychics find ourselves doing. Knowledge is such a powerful tool and those who have passed before us once again have a plethora of wealth when it comes to that.

Any magic can be deemed evil. I've seen Priests of the cloth, clergy men upturn prayers and mold them into curses. Healing prayers turning into spiteful words of power woven to destroy rather than cure. It's all about how you use your gifts.

A hunting rifle is just that. A rifle used to hunt. But what your using it to hunt for can make all the more diffrence as to your intentions..good or evil. Killing a deer for food is survival and normal. Killing your neighbor for letting his dog poo in your yard well thats a completely diffrent story.

*shrug* This is just my insight on the whole good and evil of magic.

Necromancy...yes it is inherently evil as those who practice this art are normally unscrupulous individuals looking to hurt rather than heal.

Arkaine
"The Black Priest"

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 5:20 am
by Cybermancer
[Robyn]

The answer to this topic is subjective and dependend on individual respondants definitions.

Starting with one's definition of evil.

Some have put forward that necromancy is evil because it violates the natural order. As does any magic by it's very, well nature. Thus the applied terminology of supernatural and paranormal. To take it a step further, manipulating species of rice to produce superior yields is a deliberate rearrangement or change to the natural order. Such manipulation currently feeds millions.

Some have compared magic to firearms. Both are tools and therefore neither good or evil. Only their use is. Both are also weapons. While firearms are generally not viewed as inherently evil some weapons such as nuclear warheads, chemical agents and biological vectors are seen as abhorrent, to the point of their use being viewed as evil by many-though not by all.

Therefore necromancy and it's use is subjective and dependent on an individuals definition of good or evil.

I have observed that the definition of good and evil is variable between cultures, generations, decades and individuals. There is no unified or agreed upon measure of either concept. Therefore I do not beleive that either truly exists except as word icons whose meaning vary from individual to individual. One says that something is evil and it is understood that the individual involved percieved that thing to be very bad and morally opposed to the speaker.

Is necromancy evil? Only if its function is very bad to you and in opposition to your morals. This will of course vary from individual to individual.

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:49 pm
by GhostSpider
Has anyone heard of forensic necromancy?

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 9:38 pm
by Grace
Good...

Evil...

I'm the one with the gun.

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:52 am
by GhostSpider
Hail to the king, baby.

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:17 pm
by Michael T
I have used necromancy for forensic uses many times, I am afraid I need to do so again.

Why play with evil forces?

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:00 pm
by Eilonwy Solstice
Why? You saw what happened to Josh when he fiddled with necromancy, didn’t you Michael?

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:56 pm
by GhostSpider
Actually forensic necromancy is a "gray" art, if used for the right puposes. I've seen it worked on several occasions, by mages I trust implicitly.

Describing colors to a blind woman . . .

Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 5:25 pm
by Eilonwy Solstice
Maybe I’m just suspicious because of the terminology involving “necromancy” within, Konrad. Would you care to describe to me just how it works, please? Because I do not understand how something can be, as you put it, a “gray” art, if used for the right purposes.’ I understand how it can be used for good or for ill, but it would indicate a disposition inclined toward evil harm if it is merely “gray” when used for the right reasons.

I’m sorry. Maybe it’s just the attempt at trying to describe it in colors to a blind woman.

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 11:19 pm
by Technocrat
I think necromancy in itself, is just a form of magic. And magic is just an energy source that can be manipulated through thought and will. Exactly how is a little beyond me but there you go.

So as such, it is not in itself good or evil. But how it is used that determines it's morality. So creating zombies and mummies is evil but asking dead spirits how they died doesn't seem harmful to me.

I wish I believed you there, Techno . . .

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:53 am
by Eilonwy Solstice
I wish I believed you there, Techno. But after listening to Josh’s account, who did use it for a good cause, I have to wonder . . . he didn’t come out unhurt, if I miss my guess.

Re: Magic: Which is evil?

Posted: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:03 pm
by Michael T
KT was set up by Winder with a trap in the spells and formulas that were in the tomes KT got ahold of. If one is trained in the arcanist arts they would see the formula was not right, they may not of known what was wrong. KT was useing very sound means of study and reseach, he was just in a field he was not ready for. No offense KT, we all make mistake some times.

Necromancy can be used for good, to find out how some one was killed or died. To find some one who is missing, to understand aliments that are not natural. I don't dabble in it often, but I do understand every spell I do use as well as I do my other spells. Any one trying to use necromancy should first get help from some one they trust and who understands it.

Michael T.