Re: Trouble?
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:02 pm
Nemesis wrote:I see no conflict.
I wouldn't expect that you could.
Nemesis wrote:I see no conflict.
Natasha wrote:Except that they don't do it for the money.Logan wrote:Don't see what the problem with his job is. A SWAT team member gets paid for killing people and it's acceptable. A soldier gets paid to kill people and that is acceptable.
You're partially correct; it's good to know what motivates you. It's great to know what motivates you, actually. So when I'm in desperate need of help (and broke or have no time to negotiate equitable terms) I'll know not to send a SOS anywhere your way. Instead, I'll send it to those members here who are both more qualified than you to do the job and more important willing to do it without giving the danger or the cost a second thought.Brutal wrote:I would suggest you keep in mind that at times you can only someone that is getting paid; that way at least you know what motivates them.
Probably not, but this is not a response to my point. But you asked. I think they would do it even if the pay was less than it already is.Brutal wrote:You think SWAT would do what they do without being paid?
Of course you wouldn't want to. Why would you set your strawman on fire?Nemesis wrote:I don't expect I would want to.
Natasha wrote: You're partially correct; it's good to know what motivates you. It's great to know what motivates you, actually. So when I'm in desperate need of help (and broke or have no time to negotiate equitable terms) I'll know not to send a SOS anywhere your way. Instead, I'll send it to those members here who are both more qualified than you to do the job and more important willing to do it without giving the danger or the cost a second thought.
Cybermancer wrote:Don't worry Natasha. Now you have a genuine hero to call on when you need help.
Brutal wrote: Is hero listed in the yellow pages now? Maybe I should advertise there now?