You're an unknown.
And you've said odd things.
Finally, you have lumped everyone into one pile in your criticism. Not everyone has responded to you in the same manner.
For example, when you say things like...
Reckoner wrote:And you people have the gall to wonder why Victor Lazlo doesn't talk to any of you anymore.
It is reasonable to ask about clarification. I will explain by breaking the sentance down for you.
And you people
You are addressing the boards at large. You are also seperating yourself from the rest of us. By saying 'You', the 'Me' is excluded.
have the gall to wonder
The word 'gall' is provocative langauge. It suggests "We" but not "you" are in the wrong to wonder.
why Victor Lazlo doesn't talk to
Here you are refering to a man who is missing. You do not refer to him as missing however. You refer to him as not talking to us. As though this is a choice. There is no reason to assume that a man who is missing would talk to any of us. Unless you have information on the subject that we do not. Therefore, it is here that your language suggests that Victor Lazlo is not in fact missiong, but
choosing not to talk to us. And as shown in the previous portion of your statement, it is we (but not you) who are wrong to wonder why this is so.
any of you anymore.
Again the reference to 'you', meaning us. Again setting us apart from you. Further, the 'anymore' reinforces the earlier portion of the sentance regarding Victor Lazlo not speaking to us anymore. This adds emphasis to the implied idea that it is our attitudes that has caused the man not to talk to us as opposed to, oh I don't know, THE MAN BEING MISSING!
So when you make odd, suggestive statements like the above, you should expect someone asking for you to clarify yourself. Which is what I did. Which is the opposite of 'jumping to a conclusion" as it is a querry aimed at addressing a knowledge deficit. IE, an attempt to get all the facts before jumping to a conclusion.
Lumping everyone on the boards together when addressing greivances does not help your case either. There are different
individuals here, all responding to things you've said in different ways.
I shall go over those.
Prof Ali: He expresses astonishment over your boast that you specialize in dealing with ancient gods.
Joe Smith: He suggests an advertising slogan.
Holister: Suggests maybe recruiting you to deal with Not Ron and Khavik.
In a later post, he suggests that it should be easy for you.
Kolya: Offers you both encouragement and advice.
Hollister again: Points in the direction of the information you're asking for.
Kolya again: Suggest you contact Technocrat.
He then addresses Holister about something not directly concerning you.
Holister again: Mentioning Azreal may be headed down to DC.
Holister again, again: Laughs at you.
Holister again, again, again: Wishes you luck.
Kolya again: Again suggests you PM Technocrat.
Holister again: Brings up the subject of your god-slaying exploits.
Holister again, again: Spam.
Technocrat: Posts a direct reply to you. Openly states he is not in charge. Asks for someone else to step up (I notice there was a lot of pushing and shoving to be in front).
Kolya: Apologizes to Technocrat for the misunderstanding.
Holister: Mentions Azrael again.
Technocrat: Asks if said person is stable.
Holister: Half answers the question.
Technocrat: Expresses dismay over the 'but'
Holister: Directs the reading audience to read about Azreal.
Wie:
Welcomes you to the boards. Also offers words of caution in a well meaning tone.
Me: I ask for clarification about what you are referring to in regards to carriers.
Cessiel: Compliments you on your wisdom.
And then makes a rather strange comment about King Solomon.
Stephen: Asks if you're the best and if you're interested in a job.
Me: In a breif bit of pride, jest that I'm the best but he should consider hiring you anyway.
Hannah: Offers information on Khavik's background. Then encourages you to go after Khavik.
Doctor Boggs: Expresses dismay at your ability to take on some sort of ancient evil.... I confess I don't understand his jargon here. But then he expresses hope that he can retire now that you're here.
Cybermancer: Suggests that the good doctor has job security still.
Doctor Boggs again: Is wistful about the prospect of retirement.
Cybermancer: Offers sympathy and compares positions.
Doctor Boggs again: Responding to you, he suggest that you are not handling criticism well and the he'll move along and not bother you anymore.
Me: Asking for clarification to your statement.
Gabriel: Reminds us that Khavik can feel pain.
*EDIT*
Shang Li: Says a bunch of stuff I don't understand but what I do understand is that he is offering advice on Khavik by pointing out facts. He is also offering an alternate hypothesis as to why Victor Lazlo does not speak here.
I have left out your posts because what I am addressing here is your perception of your welcome here vice what has actually happened.
Some have expressed dismay over claims that you can deal with the powers of dark gods.
Some have welcomed you.
Some have pointed you towards information.
Some have asked for clarification of your statements.
Some have offered support and encouragement.
One offered you a job.
Only Hannah asked you to deal with Khavik.
No one has jumped to conclusions, basing their responses on your statements. Or else they have asked for clarification of those statements.
There have been no swarm of hyena's.
Before you start thinking you've had a less than warm welcome here, I suggest you check out what I went through
here and
here. And despite what I've done since and what I'm doing right bloody now, I still get flak. I work around it while engaging my detractors in debate.
If you're wondering why I have not taken you up on your offer, I will tell you plainly. You're an unknown quantity. You have not followed up on information offered to you nor apparently a blatant job offer. Instead you have made lofty claims and then ranted when things have not gone your way. Maybe you are what you claim to be but I do not currently have the time nor resources to check into you.
This makes you look bad, not
us.
If you wish to be taken seriously, then I would start by adjusting your attitude. Start acknowledging that we are not a single entity but seperate individuals who have all responded to you differently. Clarify your statements without rancor. When people point you to information, follow those leads. When people offer you work, then take it.
But for heavens sake, cut yourself down from the cross. It's unsightly.