Deacon Ash-Shaytan wrote:It's called "freedom of speech," Kon. One of nine other rights we have in this government of the United States of A.

http://americanhistory.about.com/od/usc ... ending.htm You mean one of 26 others. You fail!

And her handicap just makes it all the worse. She's just using her blindness to hide her true intentions.

Asshole, you're now accusing THREE of my good friends of wrongdoing. Ron says Ei has an alibi, and Hannah vouches for her as well, so you're accusing all three of them, now.

You'd best shut it now before I pull the strings I have and get you kicked off the boards.

OK, totally ignoring Deacon's willingness to accuse someone who's totally innocent, I think we need to find out FOR CERTAIN who this is. We've got a couple hypotheticals, but is there any way to find out for sure if it's Hawk, or Dark, or whatever sinister nickname they've come up with this week?

Ben: Thanks...but if you could ship it UPS instead, that'd be great. Not just because of company loyalty, but the FedEx guy always gets here when Lex is trying to sleep... I'd tell you not to worry about it, but--I know that's not your style.

Angel: As of right now, not to my knowledge... I mean, I can try and consult with my runes, but I don't know if I'll get a straight answer or not.

KT, I love you like a brutha, but you gotta switch to decaf.

Deacon Ash-Shaytan wrote:...her handicap just makes it all the worse. She's just using her blindness to hide her true intentions.

You don't know them like I do. Celeste was (and Loni is) my student and my friend. The passive-aggressive guilt trip bullshit in the OP ain't their style.

Deacon Ash-Shaytan wrote:I say, she's using her "vulnerable" image to her advantage.

Why do you think that is more likely than her account being hacked?

Deacon Ash-Shaytan wrote:

Sir Typhis Black wrote:Have you no decency sir. No sense of honor. No shame.

Nope. None. But I do have one damn fine sense of justice.

Where's the justice in accusing someone of something they physically couldn't have done? Do you say justice is done because someone's in jail, regardless of whether or not they're innocent? I thought the justice system declared all parties innocent until PROVEN guilty, not guilty until proven innocent! Exactly what the hell kind of witch hunt are you trying to stir up?

Deacon Ash-Shaytan wrote:Nope. None. But I do have one damn fine sense of justice.

Like Angel said, what happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? First you're promoting our government, then you're stripping away everything it stands for? Fucking hypocrite.

It's called "freedom of speech," Kon. One of nine other rights we have in this government of the United States of A.

I was talking about the Bill of Rights, my friend. http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution ... ights.html YOU fail.

If you'd said the Founding Fathers, you might've won this one, but...nope. Our government has made 27 amendments. The first 10 only get special note because they were put in place by the Founding Fathers.

And of course they would vouch for her. They freaking LIVE with her, buddy. As I said before, I'm looking into this. If what she says is true, I will retract my accusation. They say justice is blind. I say, she's using her "vulnerable" image to her advantage.

So you're investigating a couple of posts made on the Internet. A couple of posts that a member with administrative powers can't trace, for one reason or another. *How*, exactly, are you "looking into this"? By throwing blame and accusation around? By jerking off in front of a computer screen?

In the grand scheme of things, this isn't even that big of a deal. Someone made a couple of posts to rile up one of our members. Big fucking deal. No, the real problem is that some asswipe comes in here, demanding someone prove their own innocence, when there are two eye-witnesses saying that the person is innocent, two well-trusted and well-established eye-witnesses at that.

Alright Mr. Big-shot Investigator Moron--err, Dude... What's the motive? What does Ei get from antagonizing Ben? What proxy server was she using to hide her tracks? All evidence points to that she's still at least trying to be on friendly terms with Ben. Why would she pretend to be nice to his face, and turn around and lie to the entire society to be mean to him behind his back? Seems to me she'd have too much to lose. I don't even need a belief in the paranormal to come to this conclusion.

Go crawl back under whatever rock you crawled out from, and stop pretending you're on some high horse. Have a nice day.

OK, if you're done the pissing contest, would you mind getting to the REAL point?

Oh, that's awesome. You can copy and paste a link! Monkey see, monkey do, eh, Deacon? Do you fling your own shit, too? Oh, wait, wait, I guess not...since I flung that one your way, first. Guess you really are an asswipe.

The amendments following the Bill of Rights wouldn't've been added if they weren't seen as basic rights that needed to be addressed. All of the amendments, if they aren't necessarily rights themselves, are based in upholding the rights of the US citizenship. Some of these are direct outlines of rights of certain aspects of the citizenship (such as the rights of women and minorities to vote), others protect the citizenship from unfair governments by limiting powers and terms of office in the presidential, congressional, and judicial seats. All of them are either definitions of--or are written in the interests in protecting--the rights of the citizens of the US of A.

Sorry, you are WRONG.

Three...is a magic number...