The Scientific American's Take on Cryptozoology

A place where members can debate rumors and claims of conspiracies, cover-ups and secret government activities.
Post Reply
Ron Caliburn
Posts: 6915
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: Best if you don't know.

The Scientific American's Take on Cryptozoology

Post by Ron Caliburn »

Ain't nuthin' that can't die.

Delta Sierra
Debunker
Posts: 159
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 8:56 am
Location: My Paranromal team is based in the U.K., but we travel world wide

Re: The Scientific American's Take on Cryptozoology

Post by Debunker »

I employ Sulloway’s maxim every time I encounter Bigfoot hunters and Nessie seekers. Their tales make for gripping narratives, but they do not make sound science. A century has been spent searching for these chimerical creatures. Until a body is produced, skepticism is the appropriate response.


I couldnt have said it better myself.

Elliott James Tobias III
AKA: Debunker


"The truth is indeed out there...science has been pointing it out for centuries."
Last Moon
Posts: 171
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 4:16 pm

Re: The Scientific American's Take on Cryptozoology

Post by Last Moon »

This is a great problem in my research as well. Very few documented bodies have been recovered and they almost all have turned out to be indistinguishable from animals or to be men dressed in animal pelts or with unusual quantities of body hair. As of yet there has been no confirmed recovery of a fully hybrid form Therian.
Post Reply